Advertisements

The CESTAT Kolkata has ruled in favor of M/s. Eastern Lights Industries Pvt. Ltd., overturning the customs confiscation and penalties imposed on the import of second-hand servers. The tribunal held that servers are not restricted goods and rejected allegations of misdeclaration and undervaluation, granting full relief to the appellant.

The customs department alleged that:

  • The appellant misdeclared and undervalued the imported goods.
  • The imported servers were classified incorrectly and should be considered “Automatic Data Processing Machines”, which are restricted items under DGFT Notification No.05/2015-20.
  • Additional undeclared components (such as power supply units and switches) were found, leading to the rejection of the declared assessable value and its re-determination at a higher amount.

Key Issues Considered in the Appeal:

  • Was the confiscation of imported ‘servers’ under Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962 justified?
  • Were the penalties under Sections 112(a)(i) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962, appropriate?

Findings of the Tribunal:

Classification of Goods:

  • The Tribunal ruled that the imported items were indeed “Servers” and not “Automatic Data Processing Machines” as alleged by customs authorities.
  • The Tribunal emphasized that servers are different from personal computers and laptops, citing previous rulings such as Microsoft Corp. India Pvt. Ltd. (2008) and Dell India Pvt. Ltd. (2008), where servers were classified separately.

Misdeclaration & Undervaluation:

  • The Tribunal rejected the customs authorities’ claims that the servers were misdeclared.
  • The undeclared parts (power supply units, switches, etc.) were essential components of the servers and not standalone goods.
  • The value of these components was already included in the total value of the declared servers, and therefore, the re-determination of value was not warranted.

Confiscation & Penalties:

  • The Tribunal overturned the confiscation order, stating that the goods were not restricted imports under the DGFT Notification.
  • Since no misdeclaration or undervaluation was established, the penalty under Section 114AA (for fraudulent declarations) was not applicable.
  • Similarly, the penalty under Section 112(a)(i) was set aside since the goods were neither restricted nor misdeclared.

Final Tribunal Order:

  • Confiscation of the imported servers was revoked as they were found to be legitimate imports.
  • Penalty of ₹20,00,000 under Section 112(a)(i) was set aside.
  • Penalty of ₹30,00,000 under Section 114AA was set aside.
  • The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was granted consequential relief as per law.

Conclusion:

The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled in favor of M/s. Eastern Lights Industries Pvt. Ltd., affirming that servers are not restricted imports, rejecting the charges of misdeclaration and undervaluation, and setting aside all penalties imposed by the lower authorities.

In case you face any issues related to Indirect Tax-Customs, GST, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Arbitration matters and Central Licensing and related advisory matters in India then please feel free to get in touch with SJ EXIM Services.

We offer Legal advice and litigation support in matters related to Indirect Tax-Customs, FTP, other Indirect Tax matters & Arbitration law, all sorts of Central licensing and related matters. Come and explore the new way of doing business with us!

1. The views expressed are based on the interpretation of the relevant information/documents, applicable law, and government policy and there is no assurance that a court or tribunal or regulatory body or other governmental authority may not interpret it differently.
2.  We are not responsible for updating or revising this article on account of any change in law or interpretation thereof or a change in events or circumstances informed or occurring after the date of this article unless specifically requested for it.
3. Our advice should not be taken or used out of context or reproduced for any other purpose or transaction. Views expressed in this update are strictly personal, based on our understanding of the underlying law.
4. We are not responsible for any injury, loss or cost arising to any person who refers to this update and acts or refrains from any act accordingly. We would suggest that detailed legal advice must be sought before relying on this update.

NOTE: All Inquiries/Consulting/Advisory/Assignments are solicited via email only & it is a PAID Service only!


Discover more from S J EXIM Services

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Let’s connect

Go back

Your message has been sent

Warning

Discover more from S J EXIM Services

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from S J EXIM Services

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Exit mobile version