CESTAT Bangalore- The rejection of the refund claims was deemed unsubstantiated and not tenable

Dated: 08.04.2025

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore, recently delivered a pivotal decision in favor of Tommy Hilfiger Arvind Fashion Pvt. Ltd. regarding refund claims for Special Additional Duty (SAD) on imported garments.

Background of the Case:

Tommy Hilfiger Arvind Fashion Pvt. Ltd. imports readymade garments, paying requisite customs duties including SAD under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. After sales across India, accompanied by payments of VAT or Central Sales Tax, the company claimed refunds of the SAD as per Notification No. 102/2007-Cus.

Initial Challenges:

Customs authorities initially denied these refunds, alleging insufficient proof linking imported garments to those sold domestically due to descriptive discrepancies in documentation.

Tribunal’s Considerations:

The Tribunal evaluated the robustness of the company’s internal tracking mechanism—the customized software ‘Voyager’—which assigns unique alpha-numeric codes to imported garments for accurate tracking and correlation. Further support came through certifications provided by a Chartered Accountant verifying the precise correlation between imported garments and domestic sales.

Key Highlights of the Decision:

  • Recognition of ‘Voyager’ as a credible, reliable internal system.
  • Acceptance of Chartered Accountant certifications confirming VAT/CST payments and correlating import and sales.
  • Determination that customs authorities’ rejection lacked substantiation.

Tribunal Verdict:

The appeal was conclusively allowed, granting the refund claims initially rejected by customs authorities.

In case you face any issues related to Indirect Tax-Customs, GST, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Arbitration matters and Central Licensing and related advisory matters in India then please feel free to get in touch with SJ EXIM Services.

We offer Legal advice and litigation support in matters related to Indirect Tax-Customs, FTP, other Indirect Tax matters & Arbitration law, all sorts of Central licensing and related matters. Come and explore the new way of doing business with us!

1. The views expressed are based on the interpretation of the relevant information/documents, applicable law, and government policy and there is no assurance that a court or tribunal or regulatory body or other governmental authority may not interpret it differently.
2.  We are not responsible for updating or revising this article on account of any change in law or interpretation thereof or a change in events or circumstances informed or occurring after the date of this article unless specifically requested for it.
3. Our advice should not be taken or used out of context or reproduced for any other purpose or transaction. Views expressed in this update are strictly personal, based on our understanding of the underlying law.
4. We are not responsible for any injury, loss or cost arising to any person who refers to this update and acts or refrains from any act accordingly. We would suggest that detailed legal advice must be sought before relying on this update.

NOTE: All Inquiries/Consulting/Advisory/Assignments are solicited via email only & it is a PAID Service only!


Discover more from S J EXIM Services

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Let’s connect

Go back

Your message has been sent

Warning

Discover more from S J EXIM Services

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from S J EXIM Services

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading