CESTAT Allahabad sets aside the confiscation orders and penalties imposed by Customs

Dated: 07.04.2025

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, in its order dated 30 August 2024, pronounced final decisions in a series of connected customs appeals involving M/s Shakti Traders, M/s B.N. International, M/s Raghunath Laxminarayan, and several individual appellants. These cases relate to a large-scale customs duty evasion through misdeclaration of the country of origin of imported dry dates, routed via the UAE but alleged to be of Pakistan origin.

Case Background:

  • Following the Pulwama terrorist attack in February 2019, the Indian government imposed 200% customs duty on goods of Pakistan origin under Notification No. 5/2019-Cus.
  • The DRI (Lucknow Zonal Unit) conducted investigations revealing that multiple importers routed Pakistani-origin dry dates through UAE to falsely claim reduced 20% customs duty under CTH 0808041030 instead of the applicable 200% under CTH 98060000.
  • Alleged mastermind Shri Kush Agarwal, Director of M/s GVO Global FZC (UAE), was said to have arranged fraudulent documentation, including Certificates of Origin.

Key Findings:

  1. Country of Origin Manipulation:
  • The Tribunal noted that dry dates imported by all three firms showed similar physical characteristics to those previously sourced from Pakistan.
  • Laboratory tests and expert opinion from Atul Rajasthan Date Palms Ltd. concluded the goods were of Indian Subcontinent origin, which includes Pakistan.

2. Statements and Evidence:

  • Multiple parties, including importers and buyers, admitted in Section 108 statements that the goods originated in Pakistan but were routed through Dubai.
  • Supporting evidence included audio recordings, purchase histories, and Dubai customs transit documents indicating origin codes as โ€œPKโ€ (Pakistan).

3. Violation of Food Safety Labeling Regulations:

  • Labels with origin and FSSAI information were stapled and easily removable, violating FSSAI Packaging & Labeling Regulations, 2011.

4. Legal Basis for Confiscation & Penalties:

  • Goods were held liable for confiscation under Sections 111(m) and 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962.
  • Penalties under Sections 112(b) and 114AA were imposed based on collusion, misdeclaration, and intent to evade duty.

Key Tribunal Orders:

  • Seized goods already auctioned; sale proceeds totaling โ‚น1.95 crores were appropriated.
  • Penalties Confirmed/Awarded:
    • M/s Shakti Traders: โ‚น15 lakhs
    • Vikas Kumar Gupta & Akash Kumar Gupta: โ‚น75 lakhs each (combined under Sections 112(b) & 114AA)
    • Shri Kush Agarwal: Multiple penalties across cases totaling over โ‚น1.5 crores

In case you face any issues related to Indirect Tax-Customs, GST, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Arbitration matters and Central Licensing and related advisory matters in India then please feel free to get in touch with SJ EXIM Services.

We offer Legal advice and litigation support in matters related to Indirect Tax-Customs, FTP, other Indirect Tax matters & Arbitration law, all sorts of Central licensing and related matters. Come and explore the new way of doing business with us!

1. The views expressed are based on the interpretation of the relevant information/documents, applicable law, and government policy and there is no assurance that a court or tribunal or regulatory body or other governmental authority may not interpret it differently.
2.  We are not responsible for updating or revising this article on account of any change in law or interpretation thereof or a change in events or circumstances informed or occurring after the date of this article unless specifically requested for it.
3. Our advice should not be taken or used out of context or reproduced for any other purpose or transaction. Views expressed in this update are strictly personal, based on our understanding of the underlying law.
4. We are not responsible for any injury, loss or cost arising to any person who refers to this update and acts or refrains from any act accordingly. We would suggest that detailed legal advice must be sought before relying on this update.

NOTE: All Inquiries/Consulting/Advisory/Assignments are solicited via email only & it is a PAID Service only!


Discover more from ๐’ ๐‰ ๐„๐—๐ˆ๐Œ ๐’๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž๐ฌ

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Let’s connect

โ† Back

Thank you for your response. โœจ

Discover more from ๐’ ๐‰ ๐„๐—๐ˆ๐Œ ๐’๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž๐ฌ

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from ๐’ ๐‰ ๐„๐—๐ˆ๐Œ ๐’๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž๐ฌ

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading