CESTAT Mumbai Affirmed that Section 149 read with Section 154 empowers corrections of self-assessment errors without needing an appeal

Dated: 16.04.2025

In a significant ruling that clarifies the scope of Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai Bench allowed the appeal of M/s Pacific Cyber Technology Pvt. Ltd., reinstating the re-assessment and refund order of customs duty erroneously paid due to clerical error.

Background:

  • The importer filed two Bills of Entry (BoE) for the same invoice due to a clerical error:
    • BoE No. 5936140 dated 04.12.2019 (correct)
    • BoE No. 5793005 dated 22.11.2019 (inadvertent duplicate)
  • Duty of ₹14,72,009 was paid mistakenly against the incorrect BoE, whereas actual duty payable was ₹4,41,603.
  • The importer sought amendment under Section 149 and re-assessment of BoE No. 5793005.
  • The Assistant Commissioner re-assessed the BoE and refunded ₹10,30,406 via order dated 05.03.2020.
  • However, the Commissioner (Appeals), on Revenue’s appeal, set aside both re-assessment and refund orders, citing violation of Section 149.

Revenue’s Argument:

  • Claimed that amendment under Section 149 post-clearance was not valid.
  • Asserted that re-assessment should have been pursued through appeal under Section 128.
  • Cited the Supreme Court’s ITC Ltd. case (2019) to argue that refund claims require prior modification of assessment.

Importer’s Contention:

  • The mistake was clerical, and correction sought through existing documentary evidence.
  • Relied on Bombay High Court’s ruling in Dimension Data India Pvt. Ltd., which held that Section 149 permits post-clearance amendment when evidence exists.

CESTAT Mumbai’s Analysis:

  • Distinguished the case from ITC Ltd. by clarifying that Section 149 is independent of appeal mechanism under Section 128.
  • Highlighted that the amendment was sought based on documents that existed at the time of clearance.
  • Noted that the Delhi High Court’s ruling in Terra Films was inapplicable as it dealt with scheme conversion, not clerical error.
  • Affirmed that Section 149 read with Section 154 empowers corrections of self-assessment errors without needing an appeal.

Final Verdict:

  • Set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)’ order dated 27.10.2021.
  • Reinstated the re-assessment order dated 05.02.2020 and the refund order dated 05.03.2020.
  • Allowed the appeal in full with consequential relief.

Significance:

  • Reaffirms that clerical errors in BoE can be rectified under Section 149 even post-clearance.
  • Establishes that refund can be processed without appeal if re-assessment is done through valid documentary correction.
  • Clarifies the distinction between amendment and reassessment via appellate remedy, offering operational ease to importers.

In case you face any issues related to Indirect Tax-Customs, GST, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Arbitration matters and Central Licensing and related advisory matters in India then please feel free to get in touch with SJ EXIM Services.

We offer Legal advice and litigation support in matters related to Indirect Tax-Customs, FTP, other Indirect Tax matters & Arbitration law, all sorts of Central licensing and related matters. Come and explore the new way of doing business with us!

1. The views expressed are based on the interpretation of the relevant information/documents, applicable law, and government policy and there is no assurance that a court or tribunal or regulatory body or other governmental authority may not interpret it differently.
2.  We are not responsible for updating or revising this article on account of any change in law or interpretation thereof or a change in events or circumstances informed or occurring after the date of this article unless specifically requested for it.
3. Our advice should not be taken or used out of context or reproduced for any other purpose or transaction. Views expressed in this update are strictly personal, based on our understanding of the underlying law.
4. We are not responsible for any injury, loss or cost arising to any person who refers to this update and acts or refrains from any act accordingly. We would suggest that detailed legal advice must be sought before relying on this update.

NOTE: All Inquiries/Consulting/Advisory/Assignments are solicited via email only & it is a PAID Service only!


Discover more from S J EXIM Services

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Let’s connect

Go back

Your message has been sent

Warning

Discover more from S J EXIM Services

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from S J EXIM Services

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading