Your cart is currently empty!
Think EXIM Think Innovation
Dated: 28.11.2022
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that penalty u/s 114A of the Customs Act,1962 is not permissible in the absence of evidence which proves the use of forged scrips to clear goods.
In the case of Commissioner of Customs And Central Excise (Delhi-IV) And M/s Friends Trading Co. Vs. Union of India And Ors, the Supreme Court held that whether the buyers had knowledge of fraud or forged/fake DEPB licences/scrips and whether the buyers were to take precautions to find out the genuineness of the scrips which they had purchased would have a bearing the imposition of penalty, though it has nothing to do with the duty liability.
Source: CESTAT, New Delhi
#KPMG, #KPMGTax, #CESTAT, #LegalUpdates, #LegalNews, #Customs, #IndirectTax, #IndirectTaxIndia, #IndirectTaxLitigations, #Deloitte, #GRANTTHORNTON, #PWC, #DeptofRevenue, #Ernsandyoung, #CBIC
Some of Our Major/Reputed Clients:
In case you still face any issues related to EXIM Policies, Customs procedures, Indirect Tax related compliance procedures and Indirect Tax and Litigation matters then please feel free to get in touch with us at the below given email IDs.
Come and explore the new way of doing business with us!
Connect with us
@ Team S.J. EXIM SERVICES, New Delhi
CP: Mr. Ravi Jha/+91-9999005379
Web: www.sjexim.services I www.sjeximtech.com (reinvented version coming soon)
EMAIL: intelconsul@gmail.com I operations@sjexim.services I ravi.jha@sjexim.services
Facebook: www.facebook.com/sjeximservices
Hello,
Welcome to SJ EXIM, your corner of the internet dedicated to all things related to Indirect tax I Customs I Arbitration I Insolvency Advisory in India. Let’s craft a solution for you! Connect via email…..
Stay updated & join our newsletter.
Leave a Reply