𝐒 𝐉 𝐄𝐗𝐈𝐌 𝐒𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬

“Indirect Tax I Indirect Tax Litigation I Customs & FTP I Central Licensing I Arbitration I Advisory”

Dated: 08.10.2026

Centre Notifies New Inland Waterways Penalty and Appeal Rules, 2026: Mandatory Inquiry, Show Cause Notice and Appellate Safeguards Introduced

The Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways, Government of India, has notified the Inland Waterways Authority of India (Manner of Holding Inquiry, Imposition of Penalty and Appeal) Rules, 2026, through Notification No. G.S.R. 852(E), dated 29 September 2026.

Framed under Section 35A(1) and (2) of the Inland Waterways Authority of India Act, 1985, the new Rules establish a structured legal framework governing the filing of complaints, initiation of inquiries, adjudication of contraventions, imposition of penalties and filing of appeals against orders passed by adjudicating officers.

The Rules prescribe procedural safeguards, including a minimum seven-day period for responding to an initial show cause notice, an opportunity to submit evidence and be heard, reasoned penalty orders, and a statutory appellate mechanism.

The notification is an important regulatory development for entities and stakeholders operating within India’s inland waterways sector.

1. Background and Statutory Framework

• The Inland Waterways Authority of India Act, 1985 provides the statutory framework governing the Inland Waterways Authority of India (IWAI) and its functions relating to inland waterways.
• Section 35 of the Act deals with contraventions and penalties, while Section 35A provides the statutory basis for adjudication and appeals.
• Exercising the rule-making powers conferred under Section 35A(1) and (2), the Central Government has prescribed detailed procedures for enforcement proceedings under the Act.
• The newly notified Rules came into force on 29 September 2026, the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
• The Rules establish a procedural framework for determining whether a specified contravention has occurred and whether a penalty should be imposed.
• Importantly, the Rules regulate the procedure for adjudication; the underlying statutory provisions of the Act remain relevant for determining the nature of contraventions and the applicable penalties.

2. Filing of Complaints Under Rule 3

Rule 3 permits any person to file a complaint before the adjudicating officer concerning contraventions referred to under Section 35(2) of the Act.

Complaints must be submitted in Form I through any of the following methods:

• Electronic means;
• Speed post; or
• Personal submission.

The prescribed complaint form requires the complainant to provide identifying and contact details, particulars of the alleged contravention, supporting evidence and the tentative monetary amount of damage, together with a cost break-up.

This framework enables the initiation of proceedings through a prescribed complaint mechanism.

However, the filing of a complaint does not itself establish liability. The allegations remain subject to the inquiry and adjudication process prescribed under Rule 4.

3. Show Cause Notice and Minimum Seven-Day Response Period

• One of the principal procedural safeguards appears under Rule 4(1).
• An adjudicating officer may initiate proceedings based on a complaint or on the officer’s own motion.
• Before proceeding with an inquiry, the adjudicating officer must issue a notice in Form II, requiring the person concerned to explain why an inquiry should not be initiated.
• The Rules expressly provide that the time allowed for responding to this notice must be not less than seven days from the date of service.
• Further, Rule 4(2) requires every such notice to indicate the nature of the alleged contravention.
• These provisions are significant because they establish minimum procedural requirements before an inquiry proceeds.
• A notice that fails to identify the alleged contravention or does not provide the prescribed minimum response period may give rise to questions concerning procedural compliance and the validity of subsequent proceedings, depending on the facts.

4. Right to Representation and Opportunity of Hearing

• Rule 4(3) requires the adjudicating officer to consider the explanation furnished in response to the initial notice.
• Where the officer concludes that an inquiry should be held, a further notice must be issued requiring the person concerned to appear on the specified date.

The Rules permit appearance either:

Personally or through a duly authorised representative.

• On the scheduled date, the adjudicating officer must explain the statutory provisions alleged to have been contravened.
• Rule 4(5) further requires a reasonable opportunity to produce relevant documents or evidence in Form III.
• These requirements reflect important principles of procedural fairness in administrative adjudication.
• The opportunity to respond to allegations, present supporting material and participate through an authorised representative can be particularly relevant where the proceedings involve technical, operational or regulatory disputes.

5. Powers of the Adjudicating Officer and Evidentiary Procedure

• Rule 4(5) expressly provides that the adjudicating officer is not bound by the provisions of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, while taking evidence.
• This provision recognises that the inquiry is an administrative adjudicatory proceeding governed by its prescribed statutory procedure.
• Nevertheless, the adjudicating officer must provide a reasonable opportunity to submit relevant evidence.
• Under Rule 4(6), the officer may also require and enforce the attendance of persons acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the matter and require production of relevant documents.
• Accordingly, the Rules confer powers for gathering evidence while simultaneously prescribing an opportunity for the person facing proceedings to present a defence.

6. Ex Parte Inquiry and Requirement to Record Reasons

• Rule 4(7) addresses situations where a person fails, neglects or refuses to appear before the adjudicating officer after being required to do so.
• In such circumstances, the adjudicating officer may proceed with the inquiry in the person’s absence.
• However, the officer must first record reasons for proceeding ex parte.
• This requirement is significant because an ex parte inquiry is not intended to follow automatically from every instance of non-appearance.
• The record should demonstrate the basis on which the adjudicating officer considered it appropriate to continue the proceedings without the concerned person’s participation.

7. Imposition of Penalties Through Reasoned Written Orders

Under Rule 4(8), the adjudicating officer may impose a penalty by written order after considering the evidence and being satisfied that the relevant statutory contravention has occurred.

Rule 4(9) requires the order to:

• Identify the provision of the Act that has been contravened; and
• State the reasons for imposing the penalty.

The requirement of a reasoned order is an important safeguard against arbitrary administrative action.

A penalty order should therefore disclose the statutory basis of liability and the reasons supporting the adjudicating officer’s determination.

Further, Rule 4(10) provides that copies of the order and proceedings must be supplied free of cost to the complainant and the person against whom the inquiry was held.

8. Three-Month Timeline for Completion of Adjudication

• Rule 4(11) provides that the adjudicating officer shall complete proceedings within three months from the issuance of notice to the opposite party.
• The provision introduces a defined timeline for adjudication and is intended to support timely disposal of proceedings.
• However, this timeline must be read alongside Rule 6, which empowers the adjudicating officer or appellate authority to extend periods specified under the Rules where reasonable cause exists and reasons are recorded in writing.
• Consequently, the three-month period should not be characterised as an absolute deadline that automatically invalidates proceedings in every case of delay.
• The legality of any extension or delayed adjudication would require examination of the relevant facts and the reasons recorded.

9. Statutory Right of Appeal Under Rule 5

• Rule 5 establishes a formal appellate mechanism against orders passed by adjudicating officers.
• Any person aggrieved by an adjudication order may file an appeal before the appellate authority in Form IV.

The principal requirements include:

• Appeal limitation: An appeal must ordinarily be filed within 30 days from the date of the order challenged.
• Condonation of delay: The appellate authority may admit an appeal after the prescribed period where sufficient cause for the delay is established.
• Supporting documents: The appeal must include a copy of the adjudication order, a statement of facts, grounds of appeal and the relevant statutory provisions.
• Mode of filing: Appeals may be filed personally, through a duly authorised representative, by speed post or electronically, in triplicate.
• Defective appeals: Where defects are identified, the appellant must be given an opportunity to rectify them within 15 days of receiving notice or within any further time allowed.
• The appellate authority may refuse admission for unrectified defects, but must record reasons for doing so.

10. Respondent’s Reply and Appellate Hearing

• Rule 5(7) requires a copy of the appeal to be served upon the respondent.
• Under Rule 5(8), the respondent may file a reply within 15 days from service of the appeal notice.
• The appellate authority may call for the records of the adjudication proceedings and must provide the parties an opportunity of being heard before passing an appropriate order.
• Rule 5(11) further requires disposal of the appeal within 60 days from the date of admission.
• This appellate mechanism provides an avenue for challenging adjudication orders on factual, procedural and legal grounds.

11. Extension of Procedural Timelines Under Rule 6

• Rule 6 authorises the adjudicating officer or appellate authority to extend periods specified under the Rules where there is reasonable cause for delay or failure to act.
• The authority must record reasons in writing.
• This provision is relevant to procedural disputes concerning delayed responses, adjudication, appeals and other prescribed timelines.
• Nevertheless, the power of extension is not expressed as an unrestricted discretion. Its exercise is linked to reasonable cause and recorded reasons.

12. Prescribed Forms Under the New Rules

The notification introduces four prescribed forms.

Form	Purpose	Relevant Rule
Form I	Filing a complaint alleging contravention	Rule 3
Form II	Issuance of show cause notice	Rule 4(1)
Form III	Submission of documents, evidence and counter-statement	Rule 4(5)
Form IV	Filing an appeal against an adjudication order	Rule 5(1)

These forms are included in the Gazette notification and form part of the procedural requirements established by the Rules.

13. Legal and Regulatory Implications

The Inland Waterways Authority of India (Manner of Holding Inquiry, Imposition of Penalty and Appeal) Rules, 2026 introduce greater procedural clarity in the enforcement of the Inland Waterways Authority of India Act, 1985.

Several important implications arise.

• Procedural fairness: The requirement to issue a show cause notice, disclose the nature of the alleged contravention and provide an opportunity to submit evidence establishes safeguards for persons facing proceedings.
• Reasoned adjudication: The requirement to identify the violated statutory provision and record reasons for imposing penalties promotes accountability in administrative decision-making.
• Appellate protection: The Rules provide an express procedure for challenging adverse orders, including an opportunity for hearing and condonation of delay where sufficient cause is established.
• Time-bound proceedings: The prescribed timelines for adjudication and appeals provide a framework for timely decision-making, subject to the extension provisions.
• Regulatory preparedness: Businesses and other stakeholders potentially subject to proceedings under the Act should maintain appropriate records, monitor statutory notices and ensure timely preparation of responses and appeals.

14. Conclusion

The notification of the Inland Waterways Authority of India (Manner of Holding Inquiry, Imposition of Penalty and Appeal) Rules, 2026 represents an important development in the procedural enforcement framework governing India’s inland waterways sector.

By prescribing the manner of filing complaints, conducting inquiries, imposing penalties and pursuing appeals, the Central Government has introduced a structured mechanism for administrative adjudication under the Inland Waterways Authority of India Act, 1985.

The emphasis on show cause notices, opportunities of hearing, reasoned orders and appellate remedies reflects the importance of procedural safeguards in regulatory enforcement. For businesses and stakeholders operating within the inland waterways ecosystem, understanding these requirements will be essential when responding to statutory proceedings and protecting their legal interests.

In case you face any issues related to Indirect Tax-Customs, GST, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Arbitration matters and Central Licensing and related advisory matters in India then please feel free to get in touch with SJ EXIM Services.

We offer Legal advice and litigation support in matters related to Indirect Tax-Customs, FTP, other Indirect Tax matters & Arbitration law, all sorts of Central licensing and related matters. Come and explore the new way of doing business with us!

We specialize in paralegal services, litigation support, tax and regulatory matters, delivering reliable, efficient, and result-oriented legal assistance.

Source: Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways

Disclaimer

Handy Download:

Connect with us for more-

@ Team S J EXIM SERVICES, New Delhi, IN

CP: Ms. Shubhra Jha, Founder

Tel: +91-11-4999 2707 I +91-9999005693

Web: www.sjexim.services

EMAIL: operations@sjexim.services  I shubhra@sjexim.services

Facebook: www.facebook.com/sjeximservices

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/90794255/admin/feed/posts/

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@aadrikaalawindia

Subscribe our WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaTxDT8JZg4CHEOSoK47

Subscribe our Telegram Channel: https://t.me/sjeximindia