Impact of Amendments to Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962 on Provisional Assessment under FTA and Special Valuation Branch (SVB)

The Finance Bill, 2025 (Bill No. 14 of 2025) introduces significant amendments to Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962, by adding sub-sections 18(1B) and 18(1C). These amendments establish a specific timeline for the finalization of provisional assessments and define exceptions where the timeframe is not applicable. While these changes primarily impact the verification of goodsโ€™ origin under Foreign Trade Agreements (FTAs), they also have a substantial bearing on provisional assessment proceedings under the Special Valuation Branch (SVB).

The amendment in the Act shall come in force from 01.05.2025 as per Clause 98 of the Finance Bill, 2025.

Understanding Provisional Assessment Under Section 18

Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962, governs provisional assessments, allowing importers and exporters to clear goods when certain information or documentation is pending. A provisional assessment is typically required in cases where the customs authorities need additional details before finalizing the duty liability. This includes:

  • Verification of Certificates of Origin (COO) under FTAs
  • Complex valuation issues, particularly in related-party transactions handled by the SVB

The newly introduced amendments seek to prevent indefinite delays in finalizing provisional assessments, ensuring faster dispute resolution and better predictability for importers.

Key Amendments to Section 18 and Their Implications

Introduction of Sub-Section 18(1B): Timeframe for Finalization

The new sub-section 18(1B) stipulates that a provisional assessment must be finalized within two years from the date of the initial provisional assessment. However, this period may be extended by one additional year if the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Customs determines that sufficient cause exists.

This amendment ensures that assessments do not remain pending indefinitely, providing clarity and certainty to importers. The introduction of a structured timeline benefits businesses engaged in international trade, particularly those involved in FTA transactions or complex valuation matters under SVB.

Introduction of Sub-Section 18(1C): Exceptions to the Timeframe

Sub-section 18(1C) defines specific situations where the two-year limit does not apply, and the period begins only when the issue delaying finalization ceases to exist. These exceptions include:

  1. Requests for information from foreign authorities under a legal process
  2. Pending appellate decisions in similar cases involving the same assessee
  3. Interim stay orders issued by appellate authorities
  4. Pending directions from the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) in related cases
  5. Cases where an assessee has applied to the Settlement Commission or Interim Board

For FTA-related verifications, the two-year period is paused if Indian customs authorities seek information from the exporting countryโ€™s authority regarding the validity of a Certificate of Origin (COO). This prevents importers from being penalized due to delays beyond their control.

Impact on Provisional Assessment under the Special Valuation Branch (SVB)

The Special Valuation Branch (SVB) of Indian Customs is responsible for investigating related-party transactions to ensure that declared import values are not influenced by relationships between buyers and sellers. SVB assessments often require extended verification processes, leading to delays in finalizing assessments.

Application of New Time Limits to SVB Cases

  • Faster Resolution of Provisional Assessments: The new two-year timeline applies to SVB cases where the declared value of imports is under scrutiny.
  • Impact on Related-Party Valuation Cases: If information needs to be sought from overseas authorities (such as a parent company or foreign customs administration), the timeframe is suspended under sub-section 18(1C)(a).
  • Clarity for Importers: The amendments bring more certainty and predictability to businesses dealing with transfer pricing and related-party import valuations, reducing financial uncertainty due to prolonged assessments.

Linking FTA-Related Provisional Assessments with SVB

While FTA-related provisional assessments focus on verifying preferential tariff claims, SVB cases deal with valuation disputes. However, both processes involve:

  1. Long verification periods
  2. Requests for information from foreign entities
  3. Delays caused by appeals and legal proceedings

By aligning the provisional assessment timelines under both scenarios, the amendments ensure that importers in both categories benefit from a streamlined process and avoid indefinite delays in duty finalization.

Conclusion: A Step Toward Efficient Customs Assessments

The amendments to Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962, mark a significant improvement in Indiaโ€™s customs administration by:

  • Establishing a clear timeline for finalizing provisional assessments
  • Providing exceptions where delays are justified
  • Ensuring smoother processing of FTA-origin verification and SVB-related valuation assessments

These changes enhance trade efficiency and reduce uncertainty for importers, making the customs assessment process more predictable and transparent.

In case you face any issues related to Indirect Tax-Customs, GST, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Arbitration matters and Central Licensing and related advisory matters in India then please feel free to get in touch with SJ EXIM Services.

We offer Legal advice and litigation support in matters related to Indirect Tax-Customs, FTP, other Indirect Tax matters & Arbitration law, all sorts of Central licensing and related matters. Come and explore the new way of doing business with us!

1. The views expressed are based on the Authorโ€™s interpretation of the relevant information/documents, applicable law, and government policy and there is no assurance that a court or tribunal or regulatory body or other governmental authority may not interpret it differently.
2.  We are not responsible for updating or revising this article on account of any change in law or interpretation thereof or a change in events or circumstances informed or occurring after the date of this article unless specifically requested for it.
3. Our advice should not be taken or used out of context or reproduced for any other purpose or transaction. Views expressed in this update are strictly personal, based on our understanding of the underlying law.
4. We are not responsible for any injury, loss or cost arising to any person who refers to this update and acts or refrains from any act accordingly. We would suggest that detailed legal advice must be sought before relying on this update.

NOTE: All Inquiries/Consulting/Advisory/Assignments are solicited via email only & it is a PAID Service only!


Discover more from ๐’ ๐‰ ๐„๐—๐ˆ๐Œ ๐’๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž๐ฌ

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Let’s connect

โ† Back

Thank you for your response. โœจ

Discover more from ๐’ ๐‰ ๐„๐—๐ˆ๐Œ ๐’๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž๐ฌ

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from ๐’ ๐‰ ๐„๐—๐ˆ๐Œ ๐’๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž๐ฌ

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading